1. My peers and I agree that my paper is both adding and challenging. I am mostly challenging what is a sponsor, according to Brandt’s definition. I am then adding to her definition to make my own definition of what a sponsor is.  When it comes to my evidence, we agree I have enough, but I want more evidence. So far I am using two articles and two literacy narratives. I want to add at least one more literacy narrative with evidence of the sponsor definition that Brandt states being challenged. We agree that I need to expand on my existing evidence and claims so far as well.
2.  My peers think I have enough background information on Brandt and Williams. I state what their articles are about and how I plan to use them in my intro.  In my narrative evidence it is the same how I explain the narrative with some background then introduce the quote with explanation. I think what I have to work on is expanding the concepts from the evidence I draw from my quotes. I have the information, I just need to expand more.
3. I think I need one more literacy narrative that has a literacy sponsor/extra that is debatable as one. I think this is a difficult task due to how little information on these types of narratives in the excel sheet. I’m hoping to find one more but if I don’t I think I could draw more on my new definition of sponsor.